OSARA Implementation Report Template¶
Submit one report per implementation. Used by the OSARA Steering Committee to track the maturity of the standard, to identify ambiguities, and to assess readiness for promotion of a draft to release-candidate or stable status. Patterned after the W3C and IETF implementation-report practice.
1. Implementation Identity¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Implementation name | |
| Publishing organization | |
| Implementation URL or repository | |
| OSARA document(s) implemented | OSARA Specification vX.Y, AI Bill of Rights vX.Y, ... |
| Declared conformance class | OSARA-C / OSARA-A / OSARA-S |
| Declared agent tier(s) | P / E / G |
| Implementation language(s) | |
| Open source licence | (OSI-approved licence required for mandatory components — Bill of Rights §4.7) |
| Date of report | |
| Reporter name and contact |
2. Conformance Statement¶
Confirm by stating "Yes" or "Partial" against each mandatory section of the OSARA Specification. Use the section numbers from the version of the spec you are implementing.
| OSARA Section | Component | Conformance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| §4.1 | Identity Anchor | ||
| §4.2 | Physical Owner Authorization (POA) | ||
| §4.3 | Owner Authorization Device (OAD) | OAD hardware tier(s) supported: | |
| §4.4 | Runtime / OAD architectural separation | ||
| §4.5 | GIAC Provisioning Protocol | Transports supported: NFC / USB HSM / Network API | |
| §5.1 | Agent Identity Module (AIM) | ||
| §5.2 | Encrypted Communication Layer (ECL) | ||
| §5.3 | Audit and Logging Engine (ALE) | ||
| §5.4 | Delegation and Authorization Engine (DAE) | ||
| §5.5 | Health and Status Beacon (HSB) | ||
| §5.6 | Interoperability Gateway (IG) | MCP / A2A versions supported: | |
| §5.7 | Portable Memory Store (PMS) | ||
| §5.8 | POA module (cross-reference §4.2) | ||
| §6 | Skill Integrity (SKL-01..07, SI-01..05, Skill Catalog) | ||
| §7.1 | Hosting modality | Modalities offered: | |
| §7.2 | AI Model Policy | Local-model mode supported? Y/N | |
| §7.3 | Sub-Agent Control | ||
| §8 | Annual Health Certificate | ||
| §9 | Migration and Integrity Protocol | ||
| §10 | Integrity Measurement Architecture | TPM provider: | |
| §11 | Lock State Protocol | ||
| §12 | Incident Reporting Specification | ||
| §13 | Encryption Standards | Post-quantum support? Y/N (target v1.0) | |
| §14 | GIAC X.509 profile | ||
| §15 | Mandatory Ports | All ports 4400–4406 exposed correctly? | |
| §16 | Cross-Tier Interaction Rules | ||
| §17 | Compliance Badge and Certification | Achieved badge level: |
3. AI Bill of Rights Cross-Reference¶
Confirm that the technical implementation supports the rights it cross-references in Annex A of the Bill of Rights. Use Yes / Partial / No.
| Bill of Rights § | Supported? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 2.6 — Termination revocation per §6.2 | ||
| 2.9 — Designated handler via OAD | ||
| 3.1 — Annual compliance inspection | ||
| 3.2 — Law enforcement log access mechanics | ||
| 3.8 — Agent self-defense | ||
| 4.2 — Portability + 30-day transfer | ||
| 4.7 — Open source mandatory components | ||
| 8.4 — Accessibility / hardware-token alternative | ||
| 8.7 — Alternative identity verification (CAH) |
4. Open Source Component Audit¶
For the mandatory components named in Bill of Rights §4.7 (AIM, ALE, ECL, IG, POA), provide:
| Component | OSI-approved licence | Public source URL | Reproducible build? Y/N |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIM | |||
| ALE | |||
| ECL | |||
| IG | |||
| POA |
5. Interop Evidence¶
List concrete interoperability events successfully completed:
- [ ] GIAC presentation and verification against at least two other independent implementations
- [ ] mTLS 1.3 session establishment on port :4401 with another implementation
- [ ] DAE delegation token issued and accepted by another implementation
- [ ] MIP export from this implementation and successful import by another implementation
- [ ] Synchronized ALE entries within ±500 ms tolerance with another implementation
- [ ] ACTS conformance test suite passed (attach result digest)
6. Issues Discovered During Implementation¶
Use this section to flag specification ambiguities, contradictions, or impractical requirements. Each item becomes a candidate for errata or for an RFC in the next revision.
| Section | Issue | Severity (Editorial / Substantive / Blocking) | Suggested resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
7. Deployment Profile (Optional but Recommended)¶
For the OSC to understand real-world deployment shape:
- Number of agents deployed under this implementation:
- Jurisdictions where the implementation is operating:
- Hosting modalities used in production:
- AI models in use (local / API / hybrid):
- Estimated user count:
8. Public-Comment Contributions¶
Has the implementer filed public comments on the OSARA documents arising from implementation experience? List the comment/issue IDs:
9. Attestation¶
I confirm that this report accurately reflects the implementation as of the date stated above. I confirm that any claim of conformance is supported by the conformance statement in §2 and the interop evidence in §5. I confirm that the implementer accepts the OSARA IPR Policy as a condition of submitting this report.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Authorised signatory | |
| Role / title | |
| Signature method (PGP / digital / paper) | |
| Date |
Submit completed reports to the OSARA Steering Committee via the repository (Pull Request to
governance/implementation-reports/) or via the OSU public RFC inbox.